Participants in the viva voce examination should include:. New evidence should not be accepted unless it can be demonstrated that is was not available at the original investigation. The author and the source must be identified clearly whenever the ideas, words, drawings, designs, data, computer programs, performances or creative works of others are used. Plagiarism that is a result of negligence is included in this definition. Effective learning frequently requires both demonstrated knowledge and critical evaluation of the work of others. Section 1 – Overviews 1 These procedures outline the implementation of the Student Coursework Academic Misconduct Rule “the Rule” and must be read in conjunction with that Rule.

New evidence should not be accepted unless it can be demonstrated that is was not available at the original investigation. Participants in the viva voce examination should include:. Examples of acts of intentional plagiarism are provided in the Appendix to these Rules. Where the case is dealt with as intentional plagiarism the Student will be provided with a copy of these Rules and will be advised in writing of:. An Authorised Appeals Officer must not have been involved in the initial investigation or determination of the case. Only the Pro Vice-Chancellor and Dean or nominee may act under the circumstances set out in Paragraph 37 and

In those cases the University aims to offer, in the first instance, support and advice, and penalties at the lower end of the scale will usually be imposed for a first incident i. At the end of each academic year mieconduct Records Manager will submit a report to the Academic Board listing by School the number of investigations that were carried out.

Only the Pro Vice-Chancellor and Dean or nominee may act under the circumstances set out in Paragraph 37 and Effective learning frequently requires both demonstrated knowledge and critical evaluation of the work of others.

Where the Academic Director is also the Unit Coordinator, the Head of School or nominee is authorised to investigate and impose penalties.

Student Coursework Academic Misconduct Rule / UNE Policy Register System

Anonymous complaints will not be accepted for investigation. It plays a major studenr in academic assessment by demonstrating how well the student has taken into account work produced by others as a basis for her or his own independent learning outcomes.

  MFA CREATIVE WRITING DLSU

The University does not tolerate dishonesty and impropriety in academic work and imposes strict penalties on any student found to have acted dishonestly or improperly in assessment processes.

On completion of the specified period of exclusion, the Student is eligible to return to a Residential College although conditions on readmission may hew applied.

Participants in the viva voce examination should include:.

Student Coursework Academic Misconduct Procedures / UNE Policy Register System

plgaiarism Late responses shall be handled automatically as an appeal and not a reopening of an original investigation. Examples of acts of inadvertent plagiarism are provided in the Appendix to these Rules.

university of new england student coursework academic misconduct and plagiarism rules

Where the case is dealt with as intentional ned the Student will be provided with a copy of these Rules and will be advised in writing of:. Where the Academic Director is also the Unit Coordinator, the Head of School or nominee is authorised to investigate and impose penalties.

Student Assist can advise any University Member or member of the public on how to make a formal complaint.

The Appeal Officer or Committee Chair will forward a report Template A6 and all associated documents to the Vice-Chancellor and Chief Executive Officer who will review the case but not receive representations when making a decision. Cursework Support Person must not be a member of the legal profession. A copy of a reprimand will be held on the student’s individual file.

At the end of each academic year the Records Manager will submit a report to the Academic Board listing by School the number of investigations that were carried out.

university of new england student coursework academic misconduct and plagiarism rules

These reports must ensure that parties involved cannot be neww. The University does not tolerate dishonesty and impropriety in academic work and imposes strict penalties on any student found to have acted dishonestly or improperly in assessment processes. They will be granted at least ten working days from the date of notification to prepare for the interview or provide a response in writing to the complaint including any evidence in defence of the complaint.

  KS3 HOMEWORK BOOKLET_2012_TE

The author and the source must be identified clearly plagiairsm the ideas, words, drawings, designs, data, computer programs, performances or creative works of others are used.

The examination may be a supervised written examination or a viva voce examination. The Vice-Chancellor shall receive the papers of universkty initial investigation and appeal but shall not receive representations when making a decision. Effective learning frequently requires both demonstrated knowledge and critical evaluation of the work of others.

Student Coursework Academic Misconduct and Plagiarism Rules

Appellants should structure their appeal in terms of Paragraph a — c and provide evidence to support their appeal. New evidence should not be accepted unless it can be demonstrated that is was not available at the original investigation.

Late responses shall be handled as appeals. If the Appeal Officer or Committee Chair decides that the appeal should be dismissed, the appellant will be informed of the details and reasons for the decision and all avenues of appeal within the University will then be exhausted. Acknowledgment of the work of others is not simply a matter misconductt honesty.

The Vice-Chancellor and Chief Executive Officer has authority to uphold the penalty, or refer the penalty to the Student Conduct Appeals Committee for reconsideration as appropriate. Access to these records is limited to the following or nominees: Assessment tasks can be designed for diagnostic, formative, summative, evaluative or informative purposes. Acknowledgment of the work of others is not simply a matter of honesty.

This is the miwconduct version of this document.

university of new england student coursework academic misconduct and plagiarism rules

They may uphold an appeal or uphold the penalties.