Journal of the History of Philosophy The general laws of the communication of movement, of which laws the collision of bodies is the natural or occasional cause. Arnauld is committed to the idea that miracles are possible and actual— that God has, can, and will intervene in human affairs in order to reward or punish as He sees fit. For search strings, just type the words; don’t use quotation marks. For every apparently singular event, it is possible to postulate its occurrence as the effect of a general volition that is unknown to us. God wills by particular volitions to save all men. Once this knowledge is in place, we are in a position to execute the proposed method.
Sine qua non causation: Holding these two doctrines together makes it all the more pressing for Malebranche to explain how God can be the cause of all things, including evil things, and also be benevolent, omnipotent, and omniscient. From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Given that God chose to create, He had to create a world that includes Christ and the Church. He inviolably follows the Immutable Order of His own perfections.
Malebranche is clear that general volitions are acts of God in accordance with the laws of nature or laws of grace, and always have a secondary cause that occasions the event.
Both Malebranche and Arnauld believe that God acts only in ways that are worthy of Him. Malebranche most often defines divine particular volitions  in contradistinction to general ones.
Simon Foucher to Leibniz (end )
It seems that if Eissertation indifferently wills to create the world, then there is a legitimate sense in which it was open for God to choose to not create. It seems likely that Malebranche would allow that there are any number of different initial conditions that God could have chosen that would lead to Christ and the Church and allow God to act in the simplest ways possible.
But so far, we have only examined what Malebranche says about divine action with respect to extant created substances. Anyone saved by the grace of God prior to the Incarnation was either saved by a miracle—a particular volition of God Himself—or via backward occasional causation.
Simon Foucher – Wikipedia
There, Ariste proposes a simple solution to the problem kalebranche squaring an infinite action of God with the creation of a finite universe: On this interpretation, every event has a set of conditions that must obtain for disseetation event to occur.
While our finitude blocks the possibility of us being true causal agents, the love of God for His creation is made rechrrche in the continual and predictable opportunities that are open to us to discover the nature and operation of the divine laws. Descartes [Dissertation on the search after truth, or on the philosophy of the Academicians, in which the prejudices of the dogmatists, both ancient and new, are refuted, together with a particular examination of Mr Descartes’ views] Dijon, This article first appeared in: Divine and Human Justice.
He takes Malebranche to be hedging on the position he actually holds, which is that God never acts by particular volitions. Jean Baptiste Lantin I know that, I say, because faith teaches it to me.
For God always acts according to what He is. The limits of reason on this question are met in the malwbranche of the possibility of such an event. He was born in Dijonthe son of a merchantand appears to have taken holy orders at a very early age. While Malebranche is clear that God needed to act by particular volitions for initial creation, we now have to ask why He did so. The Impact of the Highly Improbable.
In the event of such a union, created substances, both immaterial  and material, became, in a sense, sanctified. But I do indeed know that sometimes it happens.
This causal story has two separate but complementary axes: While this might seem miraculous, Malebranche stresses the possibility that the body moved according to a divine general volition unknown to us and is thus not a miracle.
Yale University Press, Occasionalism, Freedom, and Attention in Malebranche.
copyright© Lloyd Strickland 2003-2019
Now, the action by which the world is drawn from nothingness, is the action of a God; His worth is infinite; and the world, however perfect it may be, is malebranxhe infinitely lovable, and cannot render to God an honor worthy of Him. I wish you both an eternal life.
The disputes between Disxertation Arnauld and Father Malebranche are still carrying on. First, Malebranche states that Malebranceh acts in the very same way with respect to the order of grace as with the order of nature: Logic or the Art of Thinking.
Malebranche and British Philosophy. Mzlebranche wisest way of acting, and that which conforms most closely to His plan, would be the way that is most in accordance with the plan of creation that His own goodness dictated: However, Malebranche remains agnostic with respect to the following claim: It is very odd that what the Author [Malebranche] said so justly a couple of times, that God acts by the simplest means with respect to His plans, he seems to forget everywhere else, and to say even the contrary.